Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung HZ35W
69 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Previous Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- New Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus SP-820UZ versus Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SP-820UZ was launched 2 years after the HZ35W which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a simple overview of how the SP-820UZ grades against the HZ35W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ & Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Samsung HZ35W
| SP-820UZ | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2012 | June 2010 | Newer by 27 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| HZ35W | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Samsung HZ35W
| SP-820UZ | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-820UZ enjoys outer dimensions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus SP-820UZ versus Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the SP-820UZ and the HZ35W.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-820UZ and HZ35W is 69 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The picture below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-820UZ and HZ35W.
As you have seen, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus SP-820UZ to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The younger SP-820UZ is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-08-21 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 15.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 485 grams (1.07 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $299 | $300 |