Olympus 8000 vs Samsung SL102
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Photography Glossary Olympus 8000 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus 8000 and Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is very similar and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 8000 was introduced 6 months after the SL102 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the 8000 scores vs the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 8000 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Samsung SL102
| 8000 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus 8000
| SL102 | 8000 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Samsung SL102
| 8000 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2009 |  | January 2009 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 8000 offers physical dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus 8000 and Samsung SL102 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the 8000 vs the SL102.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and SL102.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Olympus 8000 to deliver greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively.
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called | mju Tough 8000 | ES55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-07-01 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182 grams (0.40 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $380 | $130 |