Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Launched February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched February 2012
- Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Updated by Sigma DP3 Merrill
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Olympus 8010 and Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the 8010 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 8010 was manufactured 24 months earlier than the DP2 Merrill which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the 8010 scores against the DP2 Merrill in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
| 8010 | DP2 Merrill |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Olympus 8010
| DP2 Merrill | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 | February 2010 | More recent by 24 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
| 8010 | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 8010 features physical dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check the Olympus 8010 and Sigma DP2 Merrill in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the 8010 versus the DP2 Merrill.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the 8010 and DP2 Merrill is 92 and 83 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8010 and DP2 Merrill.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 8010 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will produce extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older 8010 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
| Also called | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640x480 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 gr (0.54 lb) | 330 gr (0.73 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $600 | $931 |