Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax XG-1
91 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax XG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Introduced July 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax XG-1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-870 and Pentax XG-1, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the XG-1 (16MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-870 was brought out 18 months later than the XG-1 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the TG-870 matches up vs the XG-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax XG-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Pentax XG-1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Pentax XG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Pentax XG-1
| TG-870 | XG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2016 | July 2014 | More recent by 18 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Olympus TG-870
| XG-1 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Pentax XG-1
| TG-870 | XG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax XG-1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-870 has exterior dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Pentax XG-1 has specifications of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-870 and Pentax XG-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-870 versus the XG-1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and XG-1 is 91 and 66 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax XG-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The graphic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-870 and XG-1.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution and you can expect similar quality of images however you would want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer TG-870 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax XG-1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax XG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax XG-1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2016-01-06 | 2014-07-15 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-1248mm (52.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 567 gr (1.25 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | LB-060 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $280 | $599 |