Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/580aa/580aa8066e7f6a587d8495dc4afcf7f471af7c1b" alt="Samsung SL620 front Samsung SL620 front"
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-870 versus Samsung SL620, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-870 was manufactured 6 years after the SL620 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the TG-870 grades vs the SL620 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Samsung SL620. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Samsung SL620
TG-870 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 84 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Olympus TG-870
SL620 | TG-870 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung SL620
TG-870 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-870 comes with exterior dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-870 versus Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-870 vs the SL620.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b8a2/8b8a2d8935a3da68fa3f289a7e1d18d3926a5636" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and SL620 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/317f0/317f063c9ba8fb7bf4ed9def550562fbc0905b15" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The pic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and SL620.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-870 to give you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger TG-870 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4785f/4785f434898f6c4ec42946549ba17d87f307d6fa" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/debf5/debf5b363c2fcc1bcacfab9d121bb0a598f8f28f" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung SL620 |
Alternate name | - | PL65 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2016-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $280 | $200 |