Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13eba/13eba33ccbe166c59c9f9853741b21ecd136ed99" alt="Sigma DP2s front Sigma DP2s front"
86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Launched February 2010
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP2
- Replacement is Sigma DP2x
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus XZ-10 versus Sigma DP2s, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and DP2s (5MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and DP2s (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The XZ-10 was introduced 2 years later than the DP2s and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2s being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the XZ-10 scores against the DP2s with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sigma DP2s. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sigma DP2s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sigma DP2s
XZ-10 | DP2s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 36 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2s over the Olympus XZ-10
DP2s | XZ-10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sigma DP2s
XZ-10 | DP2s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-10 enjoys external dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sigma DP2s has proportions of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-10 versus Sigma DP2s in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-10 vs the DP2s.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0eee/e0eeeca2960c37a5e6fc4a7a7e37be3d74269db3" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and DP2s is 91 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c458/2c4580371bad9c175ec5c4e00fec2bbb134bdd25" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The visual below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and DP2s.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XZ-10 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus XZ-10 will give extra detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent XZ-10 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f931c/f931c5ee1e4e4a7753ad2edc369db246a72e88e0" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dde4c/dde4c8174ef2c76ed148490e255c86e6a2229f63" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2s Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sigma DP2s | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sigma DP2s |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 15 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 pounds) | 280g (0.62 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $428 | $940 |