Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung WB350F
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-310 and Samsung WB350F, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-310 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the WB350F which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the TG-310 grades vs the WB350F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-310 & Samsung WB350F. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-310 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Samsung WB350F
| TG-310 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus TG-310
| WB350F | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 36 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Samsung WB350F
| TG-310 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-310 features outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-310 and Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-310 versus the WB350F.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-310 and WB350F is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at a spec sheet. The image below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-310 and WB350F.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB350F to give more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged TG-310 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography highlights
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
supports face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Street photography information
Samsung WB350F Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than competition in class (155g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (276 grams)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Sports photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
weather sealing
slow fps (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (150 shots)
has no phase detect AF
long zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography info
Samsung WB350F Travel photography info
lighter than competition in class (155g)
weather sealing
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
terrible battery power (150 CIPA)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
lighter than competitors in class (276g)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Landscape photography camera
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
terrible battery power (150 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse mode
focusing manually
reasonably wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-310 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB350F as a Vlogging camera
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
reasonably wide (23mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (276g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone jack
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-310 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Olympus TG-310 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-310 | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $260 |