Clicky

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A350

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35
Olympus TG-310 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2011
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Revealed June 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A380
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A350 Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony A350, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-310 (14MP) and the A350 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the TG-310 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The TG-310 was launched 2 years after the A350 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the TG-310 grades versus the A350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Sony A350

 TG-310 A350 
RevealedJanuary 2011June 2008Newer by 32 months

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus TG-310

 A350 TG-310 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus TG-310 and Sony A350

 TG-310 A350 
Screen dimension2.7"2.7"Identical screen measurements
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-310 provides outer measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony A350 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

See the Olympus TG-310 versus Sony A350 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-310 vs the A350.

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A350 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-310 and A350 is 94 and 62 respectively.

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking specs. The picture here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-310 and A350.

All in all, both cameras posses the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The TG-310 has the tinier sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh harder. The more recent TG-310 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus TG-310
Portrait photography with Sony A350
33
decent MP (14MP)
provides face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
71
focusing manually
decent MP (14MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus TG-310
Street photography with Sony A350
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competition in class (155g)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
66
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
more heavy than average in class (674 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Sports photography information
Sony A350 Sports photography information
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
low fps (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (150 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (14MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect AF
low fps (3.0 fps)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Travel photography factors
Sony A350 Travel photography factors
67
lighter than competition in class (155g)
environment sealing
decent MP (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
terrible battery (150 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
51
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (674 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography details
Sony A350 Landscape photography details
39
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
terrible battery (150 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
64
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
doesn't have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus TG-310
Vlogging with Sony A350
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (155g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic port
9
no video recording
Photography Glossary

Olympus TG-310 vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-310 and Sony A350
 Olympus TG-310Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus TG-310 Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Class Waterproof Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2011-01-06 2008-06-06
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 3cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.20 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155g (0.34 lbs) 674g (1.49 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 65
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 595
Other
Battery life 150 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $0 $600