Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W370
Portability
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W370 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Sony W370
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
- 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
- Announced January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W370 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony W370, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the W370 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-320 was released 2 years after the W370 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-320 grades against the W370 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W370 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Sony W370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Sony W370
| TG-320 | W370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Olympus TG-320
| W370 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Sony W370
| TG-320 | W370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 has outside measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony W370 has proportions of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-320 versus Sony W370 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-320 versus the W370.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and W370 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specs. The picture underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and W370.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of photos though you might want to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more modern TG-320 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography details
Sony W370 Portrait photography details
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus TG-320
Street photography with Sony W370
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W370 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max fps very slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (150 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
Sony W370 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition in class (155g)
environment sealing
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
bad battery power (150 per charge)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow max aperture (f3.6)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography details
Sony W370 Landscape photography details
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
bad battery power (150 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow max aperture (f3.6)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging highlights
Sony W370 Vlogging highlights
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (155g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow max aperture (f3.6)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-320 vs Sony W370 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 34-238mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.6-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lbs) | 179g (0.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $0 | $230 |
