Olympus TG-610 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
93 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Olympus TG-610 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Released February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-610 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-610 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-610 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the TG-610 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-610 was unveiled 4 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the TG-610 matches up against the DP2 Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus TG-610 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-610 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-610 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| TG-610 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus TG-610
| DP2 Quattro | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 37 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-610 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| TG-610 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 920k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-610 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-610 features exterior measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-610 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-610 compared to the DP2 Quattro.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-610 and DP2 Quattro is 93 and 70 respectively.
Olympus TG-610 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by going through specs. The pic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-610 and DP2 Quattro.
All in all, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-610 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will show more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-610 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-610 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-610 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Olympus TG-610 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus TG-610 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-06 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 395 gr (0.87 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $223 | $931 |