Clicky

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Announced February 2012
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is pretty close but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The TG-820 iHS was announced 24 months later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-820 iHS grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 TG-820 iHS GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
RevealedFebruary 2012March 2010Fresher by 24 months
Screen resolution1030k920kCrisper screen (+110k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC TG-820 iHS 
Focus manually  Very accurate focus
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 TG-820 iHS GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen  No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither features Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys outside measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 92 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
More often than not, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing specs. The visual here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will provide you with greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The younger TG-820 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
	
			Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
27
 comes with face detect autofocus
 manual focus not available
 manual mode not available
 can't use external flash
 low megapixels (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
36
 you can focus manually
 exports RAW formats
 does not have liveview
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Street Comparison
Street photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Street photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
61
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proof
 screen does not articulate
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW formats
 lighter than competitors in class (355g)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sports Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography details
34
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with tracking focus
 weather proof
 low fps (5.0 frames/s)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 low megapixels (12MP)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 terrible battery (220 CIPA)
 lack of phase detect autofocus
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 does not have liveview
 max frames per second low (2.0 frames/s)
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
 no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography info
59
 weather proof
 flash built-in
 fairly wide (28mm)
 missing Timelapse function
 terrible battery (220 per charge)
 low megapixels (12 megapixels)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
60
 lighter than competitors in class (355 grams)
 has built in flash
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 sensor resolution low (10MP)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Landscape Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography information
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography information
38
 fairly wide (28mm)
 pretty good screen size (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proof
 manual focus not available
 cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
 manual mode not available
 low megapixels (12MP)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
 terrible battery (220 shots)
 missing Timelapse function
47
 you can focus manually
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 pretty good screen size (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW formats
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
 does not have liveview
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Vlogging Comparison
 Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Vlogging camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
33
 fairly wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with face detect autofocus
 video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 missing microphone support
28
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors in class (355 grams)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
 missing microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	

		

			
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus TG-820 iHSRicoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus TG-820 iHS Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Category Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2012-02-08 2010-03-18
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VI Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Tracking autofocus    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,030 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Screen tech HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 3.50 m 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 206g (0.45 pounds) 355g (0.78 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 pictures 410 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $500 $349