Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-830 iHS was revealed very close to the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the TG-830 iHS scores against the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-830 iHS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-830 iHS | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
XZ-2 iHS | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-830 iHS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | December 2012 | Same generation |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has external dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-830 iHS compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3674/e3674860376fa7fe0bb3c79ade5237776819d867" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-830 iHS and XZ-2 iHS is 91 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2b85/c2b85f036b296d88c1b422a6f48f930fb854dada" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-830 iHS and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-830 iHS with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will produce greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/baab0/baab0b59052611cfa7dae6dd1d20086bbd1e45f5" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93600/9360058afcd59e665f54175bb76fbfc11e2a9cc5" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 lb) | 346 grams (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 340 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $0 | $450 |