Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh CX4
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Here is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Ricoh CX4, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is fairly close and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-1 iHS was released 21 months later than the CX4 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the TG-1 iHS matches up versus the CX4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Ricoh CX4
| TG-1 iHS | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2012 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| CX4 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 610k | Sharper display (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Ricoh CX4
| TG-1 iHS | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS has got external dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Ricoh CX4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the CX4.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and CX4 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The visual below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and CX4.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-1 iHS to provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher TG-1 iHS is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Ricoh CX4 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-05-08 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 205g (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI90B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $399 | $211 |