Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the FX78 (12MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-2 iHS was introduced 2 years after the FX78 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-2 iHS scores vs the FX78 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Panasonic FX78
| TG-2 iHS | FX78 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2013 | January 2011 | Newer by 30 months | |
| Display resolution | 610k | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FX78 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FX78
| TG-2 iHS | FX78 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS provides external measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Panasonic FX78 has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the FX78.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and FX78 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at specifications. The image below will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and FX78.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels and you can expect similar quality of images but you really should consider the age of the products into consideration. The fresher TG-2 iHS will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
| Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-06-28 | 2011-01-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 610k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | OLED | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 142 grams (0.31 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 200 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $380 | $210 |