Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL80
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also Known as ST5500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung CL80, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-2 iHS was announced 3 years later than the CL80 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TG-2 iHS matches up against the CL80 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Samsung CL80. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung CL80
| TG-2 iHS | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| CL80 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.7" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung CL80
| TG-2 iHS | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS enjoys outer dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung CL80 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung CL80 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the CL80.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and CL80 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and CL80.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung CL80 to show more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The fresher TG-2 iHS will have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung CL80 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ST5500 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-06-28 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $380 | $400 |