Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced January 2012
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and TX200V (18MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-2 iHS was brought out 18 months after the TX200V which makes them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TG-2 iHS grades against the TX200V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony TX200V
| TG-2 iHS | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2013 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| TX200V | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.3" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 610k | Clearer screen (+620k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony TX200V
| TG-2 iHS | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has physical measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the TX200V.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and TX200V is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The picture underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and TX200V.
All in all, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Sony TX200V to deliver more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern TG-2 iHS will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 610k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | OLED | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 129 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 220 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $380 | $500 |
