Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62ad/c62adda3df33c555b7142020fb576a7ad037cf6b" alt="Olympus Tough TG-3 front Olympus Tough TG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b3f2/9b3f2d6a50d2689c7f63c3c89a882f0e770aa80f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 167g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus TG-3 versus Panasonic FX580, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and FX580 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-3 was released 5 years later than the FX580 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the TG-3 grades versus the FX580 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Panasonic FX580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Panasonic FX580
TG-3 | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 63 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX580 over the Olympus TG-3
FX580 | TG-3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FX580
TG-3 | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-3 comes with outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Panasonic FX580 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-3 versus Panasonic FX580 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-3 vs the FX580.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9a11/a9a1115241de27538baaa3c74ec6af018974eb52" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and FX580 is 90 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bc80/6bc804a70aa35ca81254a00f25ef0f429b5657db" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The photograph below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and FX580.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-3 to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The fresher TG-3 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1103/f11036dcf9b2c751c02a45d4552337f58a2830b1" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e1c3/5e1c3e86fc047c1ae9c8a506baaa3bccf1565083" alt="Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FX580 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX550 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-03-31 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $350 | $499 |