Clicky

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-30

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42
Olympus Tough TG-3 front
 
Ricoh WG-30 front
Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs

Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Introduced March 2014
  • Replacement is Olympus TG-4
Ricoh WG-30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Revealed October 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview

Let's look closer at the Olympus TG-3 and Ricoh WG-30, both Waterproof cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The TG-3 was brought out 6 months before the WG-30 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-3 grades vs the WG-30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Ricoh WG-30

 TG-3 WG-30 
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus TG-3

 WG-30 TG-3 

Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Ricoh WG-30

 TG-3 WG-30 
RevealedMarch 2014October 2014Same age
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 enjoys exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).

See the Olympus TG-3 and Ricoh WG-30 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-3 versus the WG-30.

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and WG-30 is 90 and 91 respectively.

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through technical specs. The pic here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-3 and WG-30.

As you can tell, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of files however you need to factor the age of the cameras into account.

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-30 Portrait photography details
37
decent megapixels (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
no manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
36
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-30 Street photography factors
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than others in class (247 grams)
62
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather sealing
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh WG-30 Sports photography highlights
47
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
great battery life (330 per charge)
low fps (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
45
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
weather sealing
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh WG-30 Travel photography highlights
74
great battery life (330 per charge)
environment proofing
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than others in class (247 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
71
weather sealing
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-3 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-30 as a Landscape photography camera
56
rather wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
environment proofing
great battery life (330 CIPA)
no manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
43
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-3 Vlogging details
Ricoh WG-30 Vlogging details
34
rather wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no mic support
heavier than others in class (247g)
33
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
includes face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-3 and Ricoh WG-30
 Olympus Tough TG-3Ricoh WG-30
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus Tough TG-3 Ricoh WG-30
Class Waterproof Waterproof
Introduced 2014-03-31 2014-10-09
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT-LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 3.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 247 gr (0.54 lbs) 192 gr (0.42 lbs)
Physical dimensions 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 shots 300 shots
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-92B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $350 $428