Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b2b9/0b2b9e5026839779353343b9b8b0958f8ff8257e" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Older Model is Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
- 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
- Launched January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the W370 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The TG-4 was manufactured 5 years later than the W370 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-4 matches up vs the W370 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Sony W370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sony W370
TG-4 | W370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 65 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Olympus TG-4
W370 | TG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sony W370
TG-4 | W370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 features outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony W370 has proportions of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-4 vs the W370.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddff1/ddff133686e29bd3fedb60675e83db576643a89f" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and W370 is 90 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0424/a04249f3f4c0c754a1296b46e59a88634063c96d" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The graphic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and W370.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-4 to give greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos more aggressively. The fresher TG-4 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f78f/5f78ffec385927b05eb53c2695c60cf5d2208400" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a375b/a375b5d4e68cc535d735b80040b88995058f98d4" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony W370 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-04-13 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 34-238mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.6-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 179g (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $379 | $230 |