Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
![Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Tough-TG-5/Olympus-TG-5-front.jpg)
![Pentax K-500 front Pentax K-500 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-K-500/Pentax-K-500-front.jpg)
64 Imaging
58 Features
70 Overall
62
Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Replaced the Olympus TG-4
- Updated by Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched November 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Olympus TG-5 and Pentax K-500, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-5 (12MP) and K-500 (16MP) and the TG-5 (1/2.3") and K-500 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The TG-5 was unveiled 3 years later than the K-500 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the TG-5 matches up against the K-500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-5 and Pentax K-500. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-5 Gallery and Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Pentax K-500
TG-5 | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | ![]() | November 2013 | Fresher by 43 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus TG-5
K-500 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Pentax K-500
TG-5 | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-5 features exterior dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-500 has measurements of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-5 and Pentax K-500 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-5 against the K-500.
![Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Tough-TG-5-vs-Pentax-K-500-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-5 and K-500 is 90 and 64 respectively.
![Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Tough-TG-5-vs-Pentax-K-500-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through specs. The visual below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-5 and K-500.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-5 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Pentax K-500 will provide you with more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern TG-5 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
![Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-Tough-TG-5-vs-Pentax-K-500-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Tough-TG-5-vs-Pentax-K-500-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-5 vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-5 | Pentax K-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Pentax K-500 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2017-05-17 | 2013-11-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | PRIME M |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 51600 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 20.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 250g (0.55 lbs) | 646g (1.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1087 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 710 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery model | LI-92B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $449 | $600 |