Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28610/28610d92a1bc9db50c39d8fc3686aeec0604eb40" alt="Olympus VG-110 front Olympus VG-110 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus VG-110 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The VG-110 was revealed 5 years before the WG-5 GPS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the VG-110 grades vs the WG-5 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
VG-110 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus VG-110
WG-5 GPS | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2011 | More modern by 48 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
VG-110 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-110 has exterior measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-110 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the VG-110 versus the WG-5 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f81ab/f81ab8ed5cf93430a2560e43e98ecd6f95a0244c" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and WG-5 GPS is 97 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18783/18783ff356c85a5bc2b42cc7486358433be9781e" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The picture here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to show more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged VG-110 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e1a9/0e1a91d86bfd31835d0b4a705ed17ca66c9370f5" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c516/3c516afdcc85d2daef18cbe2abe0b94274daa828" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Released | 2011-02-08 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 105g (0.23 pounds) | 236g (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 photos | 240 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $150 | $500 |