Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-50
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-50, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is very close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe VG-120 was introduced 7 years earlier than the WG-50 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the VG-120 scores against the WG-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-120 & Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-120 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Ricoh WG-50
| VG-120 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus VG-120
| WG-50 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 | January 2011 | Newer by 77 months | |
| Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Ricoh WG-50
| VG-120 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VG-120 provides physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the VG-120 compared to the WG-50.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-120 and WG-50 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The picture below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-120 and WG-50.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged VG-120 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus VG-120 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VG-120 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-01-06 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 120 grams (0.26 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 shots | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $190 | $280 |