Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W370

Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
26
Overall
33
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W370 Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Sony W370
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
  • 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
  • Announced January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W370 Overview

The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus VG-160 versus Sony W370, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the W370 (14MP) is relatively similar and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VG-160 was announced 2 years after the W370 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the VG-160 matches up against the W370 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony W370

 VG-160 W370 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012January 2010Newer by 25 months

Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Olympus VG-160

 W370 VG-160 

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony W370

 VG-160 W370 
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-160 has outside measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony W370 has dimensions of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).

See the Olympus VG-160 versus Sony W370 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the VG-160 against the W370.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W370 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and W370 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W370 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-160 and W370.

As you can see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP and you should expect similar quality of files but you really should consider the release date of the products into consideration. The more recent VG-160 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W370 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography details
Sony W370 Portrait photography details
34
MP count decent (14MP)
offers face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
28
good megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VG-160
Street photography with Sony W370
56
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Sports photography factors
Sony W370 Sports photography factors
27
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (165 CIPA)
does not have phase detect AF
35
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Travel photography camera
Sony W370 as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
no Timelapse recording
terrible battery life (165 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
58
good megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography details
Sony W370 Landscape photography details
37
reasonably wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3")
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
terrible battery life (165 per charge)
no Timelapse recording
37
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VG-160
Vlogging with Sony W370
30
reasonably wide (26mm)
offers face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone support
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W370 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Sony W370
 Olympus VG-160Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus VG-160 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2012-01-10 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 34-238mm (7.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.6-5.6
Macro focusing distance 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.80 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125g (0.28 lbs) 179g (0.39 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 165 photos -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID LI-70B NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $90 $230