Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FX78
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35


95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX77

Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FX78, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the VH-515 (12MP) and the FX78 (12MP) is very well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The VH-515 was released 20 months later than the FX78 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise summary of how the VH-515 scores against the FX78 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VH-515 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VH-515 Gallery and Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Panasonic FX78
VH-515 | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 20 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus VH-515
FX78 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Panasonic FX78
VH-515 | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VH-515 offers external measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX78 has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FX78 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the VH-515 vs the FX78.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VH-515 and FX78 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at specs. The visual here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the VH-515 and FX78.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of files though you may want to take the release date of the products into consideration. The more recent VH-515 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
Olympus VH-515 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VH-515 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-08-21 | 2011-01-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) | 142 grams (0.31 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $648 | $210 |