Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ2500
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35


53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ1000

Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ2500, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the VH-515 (12MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the VH-515 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") have different sensor size.

The VH-515 was manufactured 5 years prior to the FZ2500 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the VH-515 scores against the FZ2500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VH-515 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VH-515 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Panasonic FZ2500
VH-515 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus VH-515
FZ2500 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | August 2012 | More recent by 49 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Panasonic FZ2500
VH-515 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VH-515 has got outside dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") accompanied by a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ2500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the VH-515 vs the FZ2500.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the VH-515 and FZ2500 is 95 and 53 respectively.

Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking specs. The visual below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the VH-515 and FZ2500.
All in all, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The VH-515 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic FZ2500 will give extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The older VH-515 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus VH-515 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VH-515 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-08-21 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) | 915 gr (2.02 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $648 | $998 |