Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Released February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-330 was introduced 4 years before the DP2 Quattro which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the VR-330 scores vs the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-330 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| VR-330 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus VR-330
| DP2 Quattro | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | February 2011 | More modern by 36 months | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| VR-330 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-330 has external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the VR-330 against the DP2 Quattro.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and DP2 Quattro is 94 and 70 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The image below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VR-330 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus VR-330 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-02-08 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 395 gr (0.87 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $220 | $931 |