Clicky

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
38
Overall
36
Olympus VR-330 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released February 2011
  • Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VR-330 was introduced 4 years before the DP2 Quattro which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the VR-330 scores vs the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 VR-330 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus VR-330

 DP2 Quattro VR-330 
ReleasedFebruary 2014February 2011More modern by 36 months
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 VR-330 DP2 Quattro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-330 has external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the VR-330 against the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and DP2 Quattro is 94 and 70 respectively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The image below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VR-330 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography information
33
MP count good (14MP)
includes face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
77
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Street photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography factors
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
61
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
46
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
47
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
69
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
MP count good (14MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
no Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
53
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography highlights
41
quite wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Timelapse recording
59
has manual focus
screen size is good (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
32
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone jack
9
lack of video recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-330 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus VR-330Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Company Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus VR-330 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Released 2011-02-08 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 45mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech TFT Color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 gr (0.35 lb) 395 gr (0.87 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC -
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $220 $931