Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FX78
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Panasonic FX78
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FX78, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and FX78 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VR-340 was manufactured 12 months after the FX78 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the VR-340 scores against the FX78 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-340 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VR-340 Gallery & Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Panasonic FX78
| VR-340 | FX78 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 12 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus VR-340
| FX78 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Panasonic FX78
| VR-340 | FX78 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-340 offers exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Panasonic FX78 has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FX78 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the VR-340 versus the FX78.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and FX78 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The picture below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-340 and FX78.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus VR-340 to offer you greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher VR-340 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-340
Portrait photography with Panasonic FX78
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
low resolution (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Olympus VR-340 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FX78 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (125 grams)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Olympus VR-340 Sports photography highlights
Panasonic FX78 Sports photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
low frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (200 shots)
does not have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography advice
Panasonic FX78 Travel photography advice
lighter than others in class (125 grams)
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse recording
not so great battery pack (200 per charge)
low resolution (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Olympus VR-340 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FX78 as a Landscape photography camera
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Timelapse function
decently wide (24mm)
lovely big screen (3.5")
has image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
lack of manual exposure
low resolution (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
not so great battery pack (200 per charge)
no Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging details
Panasonic FX78 Vlogging details
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
lighter than others in class (125 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone port
decently wide (24mm)
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
no external mic jack
Photography Glossary
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
| Olympus VR-340 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus VR-340 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
| Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2011-01-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/2.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 142 grams (0.31 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $130 | $210 |