Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the VR-340 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The VR-340 was introduced 4 months after the GR Digital IV which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the VR-340 scores vs the GR Digital IV in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-340 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
VR-340 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus VR-340
GR Digital IV | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
VR-340 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | September 2011 | Same generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-340 provides external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the VR-340 against the GR Digital IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d43de/d43de00578dae0f0be8034415e8a4a0e7e8aa2cc" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the VR-340 and GR Digital IV is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f37f8/f37f8bf7384ffab54640919c34bcbf4af1cb024a" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-340 and GR Digital IV.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The VR-340 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus VR-340 will result in extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cef8/5cef8189534a38a85a4638953a3c70ea77a81a3f" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff2d2/ff2d2cfce13238f6a1861fee93d5b8cf09ba893a" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus VR-340 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VR-340 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.80 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $130 | $599 |