Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-M1

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Ricoh WG-M1 front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
22
Overall
32

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Announced September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview

Following is a in-depth review of the Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The VR-340 was unveiled 3 years before the WG-M1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the VR-340 grades vs the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Ricoh WG-M1

 VR-340 WG-M1 
Display size3"1.5"Larger display (+1.5")
Display resolution460k115kClearer display (+345k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus VR-340

 WG-M1 VR-340 
AnnouncedSeptember 2014January 2012More modern by 32 months

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh WG-M1

 VR-340 WG-M1 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-340 has got exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the VR-340 and the WG-M1.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-340 and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-340 and WG-M1.

Clearly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-340 to deliver greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged VR-340 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Portrait photography camera
34
good resolution (16MP)
provides face detect focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
30
decent MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Street photography camera
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
53
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
max ISO too low (800)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VR-340
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-M1
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
provides tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
38
decent MP (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
better than average battery life (350 per charge)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Travel photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography details
69
lighter than competition in class (125g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
64
better than average battery life (350 shots)
environment proofing
decent MP (14 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VR-340
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-M1
43
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
35
decent MP (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
better than average battery life (350 shots)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (1.5 inch)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (800)
lacks RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Vlogging details
Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging details
33
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
lighter than competition in class (125g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone port
26
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
does not have external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh WG-M1
 Olympus VR-340Ricoh WG-M1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VR-340 Ricoh WG-M1
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Revealed 2012-01-10 2014-09-12
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 3200 800
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) (1×)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.7 f/2.8
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 1.5"
Resolution of screen 460k dot 115k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs -
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.80 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 gr (0.28 lb) 190 gr (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 shots
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-50B DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD/microSDHC, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $130 $2,000