Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Launched June 2008
  • Later Model is Sony A380
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus VR-340 versus Sony A350, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the A350 (14MP) is fairly similar but the VR-340 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The VR-340 was unveiled 3 years after the A350 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the VR-340 matches up against the A350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Sony A350

 VR-340 A350 
LaunchedJanuary 2012June 2008More modern by 44 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus VR-340

 A350 VR-340 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Sony A350

 VR-340 A350 
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VR-340 comes with physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony A350 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

Examine the Olympus VR-340 versus Sony A350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the VR-340 vs the A350.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VR-340 and A350 is 96 and 62 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The pic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-340 and A350.

To sum up, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VR-340 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus VR-340 will offer more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more recent VR-340 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography features
Sony A350 Portrait photography features
34
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
supports face detection focus
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
71
has manual focus
good MP (14 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Street photography information
Sony A350 Street photography information
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (125g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
66
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (674 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Sports photography details
Sony A350 Sports photography details
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (14MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Travel photography advice
Sony A350 Travel photography advice
69
lighter than others (125g)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
51
good MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (674g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A350 as a Landscape photography camera
43
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
64
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (14MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Vlogging details
Sony A350 Vlogging details
33
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
lighter than others (125 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone socket
9
can't record video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Sony A350
 Olympus VR-340Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VR-340 Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2012-01-10 2008-06-06
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.7 -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.80 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 grams (0.28 lb) 674 grams (1.49 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 65
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 595
Other
Battery model LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $130 $600