Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12c81/12c817401ce2f8957e577f0ee287d1054036861a" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front"
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Launched June 2008
- Later Model is Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus VR-340 versus Sony A350, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the A350 (14MP) is fairly similar but the VR-340 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The VR-340 was unveiled 3 years after the A350 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the VR-340 matches up against the A350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-340 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-340 Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Sony A350
VR-340 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | June 2008 | More modern by 44 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus VR-340
A350 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Sony A350
VR-340 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VR-340 comes with physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony A350 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-340 versus Sony A350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the VR-340 vs the A350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ea4d/6ea4de1b51dca72282e6846e6089e8b86fb5cbf0" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VR-340 and A350 is 96 and 62 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b735b/b735b1a561c7da523449e22d83002dca4265e992" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The pic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-340 and A350.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VR-340 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus VR-340 will offer more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more recent VR-340 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a85e1/a85e1a81c1ebb803a316ba2701b5fa30ea4a15fc" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdd64/bdd64aff316635f98d1516e365df8926eb34f61b" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony A350 Specifications
Olympus VR-340 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-340 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2008-06-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.80 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 674 grams (1.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 65 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 595 |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $130 | $600 |