Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
![Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-XZ-2-iHS/Olympus-XZ-2-iHS-front.jpg)
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ300/Panasonic-FZ300-front.jpg)
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Revealed July 2015
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ200
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FZ300 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FZ300 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 3 years before the FZ300 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the FZ300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FZ300
XZ-2 iHS | FZ300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FZ300 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2015 | ![]() | December 2012 | More modern by 31 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ300
XZ-2 iHS | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ300 has proportions of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") and a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the FZ300.
![Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-XZ-2-iHS-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ300-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and FZ300 is 85 and 59 respectively.
![Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-XZ-2-iHS-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ300-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The image below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and FZ300.
As you can see, both the cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS offers the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
![Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-XZ-2-iHS-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ300-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-XZ-2-iHS-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ300-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2015-07-16 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 691 grams (1.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 380 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $450 | $598 |