Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
85
Imaging
36
Features
67
Overall
48
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
51
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Released December 2012
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Revealed November 2009
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is very similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The XZ-2 iHS was launched 3 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 XZ-2 iHS GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
RevealedDecember 2012November 2009More modern by 38 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 XZ-2 iHS GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Display resolution920k920kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 85 and 77 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The picture below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

As you have seen, both of the cameras have the same resolution but not the same sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS provides the tinier sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder. The fresher XZ-2 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography features
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography features
45
has manual focus
supports face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
54
manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
low MP (12 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Street photography camera
65
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
small sensor (1/1.7")
heavier than competition (346 grams)
61
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (340 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect autofocus
31
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
fixed focal length (50mm)
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
bad battery pack (320 shots)
has no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
61
better than average battery life (340 shots)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (346 grams)
low MP (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
49
built-in flash
bad battery pack (320 shots)
low MP (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography information
54
has manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (340 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
lack of Time Lapse recording
46
manual focus
nice screen size (3 inches)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (50mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
bad battery pack (320 shots)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Vlogging camera
36
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has external mic support
does not posses selfie friendly display
heavier than competition (346 grams)
20
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSRicoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus XZ-2 iHS Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Category Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2012-12-18 2009-11-10
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 12800 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 50mm (1x)
Max aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.5
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 346 gr (0.76 lbs) 453 gr (1.00 lbs)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 shots 320 shots
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $450 $566