Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is very similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 3 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| XZ-2 iHS | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | November 2009 | More modern by 38 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| XZ-2 iHS | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 85 and 77 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The picture below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have the same resolution but not the same sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS provides the tinier sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder. The fresher XZ-2 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2009-11-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) | 453 gr (1.00 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | 320 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $450 | $566 |