Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Samsung HZ25W front
Portability
70
Imaging
35
Features
32
Overall
33

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Launched December 2012
Samsung HZ25W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
  • Released July 2010
  • Alternative Name is WB5000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is very comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and HZ25W (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The XZ-2 iHS was released 2 years later than the HZ25W and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the HZ25W for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung HZ25W

 XZ-2 iHS HZ25W 
ReleasedDecember 2012July 2010Fresher by 30 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 HZ25W XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ25W

 XZ-2 iHS HZ25W 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).

Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the HZ25W.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and HZ25W is 85 and 70 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing only by going through a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and HZ25W.

Clearly, both of the cameras have the same resolution but not the same sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS has got the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult. The more modern XZ-2 iHS will have an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography info
Samsung HZ25W Portrait photography info
46
you can focus manually
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
34
has manual focus
saves RAW formats
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Samsung HZ25W as a Street photography camera
66
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
heavier than competitors in class (346 grams)
55
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography information
Samsung HZ25W Sports photography information
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking focus
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
34
excellent zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Travel photography with Samsung HZ25W
61
better than average battery life (340 shots)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors in class (346 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
52
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
great reach (624mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography factors
Samsung HZ25W Landscape photography factors
55
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
43
has manual focus
rather wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not possible
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
Samsung HZ25W as a Vlogging camera
36
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has mic port
does not have selfie friendly display
heavier than competitors in class (346 grams)
24
rather wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ25W
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSamsung HZ25W
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus XZ-2 iHS Samsung HZ25W
Also called - WB5000
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2012-12-18 2010-07-06
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Maximum boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 26-624mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.8-5.0
Macro focusing range 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 5.60 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 346g (0.76 lbs) 428g (0.94 lbs)
Physical dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $450 $350