Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5000
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is very comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and HZ25W (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-2 iHS was released 2 years later than the HZ25W and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the HZ25W for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Samsung HZ25W. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung HZ25W
XZ-2 iHS | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | July 2010 | Fresher by 30 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
HZ25W | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ25W
XZ-2 iHS | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the HZ25W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and HZ25W is 85 and 70 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing only by going through a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and HZ25W.
Clearly, both of the cameras have the same resolution but not the same sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS has got the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult. The more modern XZ-2 iHS will have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung HZ25W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung HZ25W |
Also called | - | WB5000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 428g (0.94 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $450 | $350 |