Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W
Portability
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Portability
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Samsung HZ25W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is very comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and HZ25W (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was released 2 years later than the HZ25W and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the HZ25W for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Samsung HZ25W. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Samsung HZ25W
| XZ-2 iHS | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| HZ25W | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Samsung HZ25W
| XZ-2 iHS | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the HZ25W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and HZ25W is 85 and 70 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing only by going through a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and HZ25W.
Clearly, both of the cameras have the same resolution but not the same sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS has got the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult. The more modern XZ-2 iHS will have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography info
Samsung HZ25W Portrait photography info
you can focus manually
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
has manual focus
saves RAW formats
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
Samsung HZ25W as a Street photography camera
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
heavier than competitors in class (346 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography information
Samsung HZ25W Sports photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking focus
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Travel photography with Samsung HZ25W
better than average battery life (340 shots)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors in class (346 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
great reach (624mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography factors
Samsung HZ25W Landscape photography factors
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
has manual focus
rather wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not possible
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
Samsung HZ25W as a Vlogging camera
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has mic port
does not have selfie friendly display
heavier than competitors in class (346 grams)
rather wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone port
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also called | - | WB5000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 428g (0.94 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $450 | $350 |