Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97595/97595091e04b873f01a3fddd6303aaf9df4a4ff6" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Panasonic and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FX78 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is fairly comparable but the FX78 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The FX78 was introduced 19 months after the GR Digital III making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the FX78 grades versus the GR Digital III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are provided at Panasonic FX78 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
FX78 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 19 months |
Display sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Panasonic FX78
GR Digital III | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX78 and Ricoh GR Digital III
FX78 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FX78 has outer dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the FX78 against the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a116/4a116d01e8d9ca8088f74de6c88db6e7df872c46" alt="Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FX78 and GR Digital III is 95 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a558/3a55822c86605f6cfb7802e60d6648c33bae8a26" alt="Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out specs. The picture below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FX78 and GR Digital III.
All in all, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The FX78 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Panasonic FX78 will provide extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern FX78 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5ede/a5edeedb627c6dda79201d3d1e0f78095a9ed55c" alt="Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02aec/02aec06ef8cc2ca1b0c7c54dc01878f48a2e6915" alt="Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Panasonic FX78 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Also called as | Lumix DMC-FX77 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-01-25 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine FHD | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.60 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 142g (0.31 pounds) | 208g (0.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $210 | $399 |