Panasonic FX78 vs Sony H200
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Panasonic FX78 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Launched January 2011
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX77
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
Panasonic FX78 vs Sony H200 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Panasonic FX78 versus Sony H200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Panasonic and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the FX78 (12MP) and H200 (20MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FX78 was unveiled 23 months before the H200 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the FX78 scores versus the H200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Panasonic FX78 vs Sony H200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic FX78 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Sony H200
FX78 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Panasonic FX78
H200 | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | January 2011 | Fresher by 23 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX78 and Sony H200
FX78 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Panasonic FX78 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FX78 has got exterior dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Sony H200 has proportions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic FX78 versus Sony H200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the FX78 vs the H200.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the FX78 and H200 is 95 and 67 respectively.
Panasonic FX78 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The graphic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FX78 and H200.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Sony H200 to produce more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older FX78 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Panasonic FX78 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FX78 vs Sony H200 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Sony |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Also called as | Lumix DMC-FX77 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-01-25 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine FHD | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 2920 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 20cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.60 m | 6.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 142 grams (0.31 pounds) | 530 grams (1.17 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | 240 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $210 | $250 |