Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax K-50
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
63 Imaging
58 Features
65 Overall
60
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax K-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Launched September 2016
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Announced November 2013
- Replaced the Pentax K-30
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax K-50 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax K-50, one is a Large Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Panasonic and Pentax. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the FZ2500 (20MP) and K-50 (16MP) and the FZ2500 (1") and K-50 (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FZ2500 was introduced 2 years after the K-50 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Pentax K-50 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the FZ2500 matches up versus the K-50 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax K-50 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 and Pentax K-50. The whole galleries are available at Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery and Pentax K-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Pentax K-50
FZ2500 | K-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | November 2013 | Newer by 35 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 921k | Clearer display (+119k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-50 over the Panasonic FZ2500
K-50 | FZ2500 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic FZ2500 and Pentax K-50
FZ2500 | K-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax K-50 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FZ2500 provides external measurements of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") accompanied by a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs) while the Pentax K-50 has measurements of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax K-50 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the FZ2500 vs the K-50.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FZ2500 and K-50 is 53 and 63 respectively.
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax K-50 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The pic here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the FZ2500 and K-50.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The FZ2500 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Panasonic FZ2500 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern FZ2500 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax K-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax K-50 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | Pentax K-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | Pentax K-50 |
Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 | - |
Class | Large Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2013-11-27 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine | PRIME M |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 51600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 915g (2.02 lbs) | 650g (1.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 70 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.6 | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | 538 | 1120 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 410 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DMW-BLC12 | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $998 | $610 |