Panasonic ZS1 vs Sony T900
91 Imaging
33 Features
25 Overall
29
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Panasonic ZS1 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Panasonic ZS1 vs Sony T900 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Panasonic ZS1 vs Sony T900, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Panasonic and Sony. The resolution of the ZS1 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly similar but the ZS1 (1/2.5") and T900 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ZS1 was manufactured 3 months later than the T900 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Panasonic ZS1 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the ZS1 scores versus the T900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Panasonic ZS1 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are available at Panasonic ZS1 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Sony T900
ZS1 | T900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Panasonic ZS1
T900 | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Panasonic ZS1 and Sony T900
ZS1 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2009 | February 2009 | Similar age | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Panasonic ZS1 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Panasonic ZS1 features outside dimensions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic ZS1 vs Sony T900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the ZS1 versus the T900.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ZS1 and T900 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Panasonic ZS1 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing technical specs. The visual here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the ZS1 and T900.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The ZS1 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony T900 will offer extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively.
Panasonic ZS1 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic ZS1 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Sony |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-TZ6 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-4.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 229g (0.50 lb) | 143g (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $0 | $300 |