Pentax WG-2 vs Sony A900
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Pentax WG-2 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Revealed October 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A99
Pentax WG-2 vs Sony A900 Overview
Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Pentax WG-2 versus Sony A900, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Pentax and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the WG-2 (16MP) and A900 (25MP) and the WG-2 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) boast different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-2 was announced 3 years later than the A900 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the WG-2 matches up vs the A900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax WG-2 vs Sony A900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax Optio WG-2 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The whole galleries are provided at Pentax WG-2 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Sony A900
WG-2 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | October 2008 | More recent by 41 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Pentax WG-2
A900 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 and Sony A900
WG-2 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-2 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-2 provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony A900 has sizing of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
See the Pentax WG-2 versus Sony A900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-2 and the A900.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-2 and A900 is 91 and 54 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-2 and A900.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-2 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Sony A900 will result in greater detail with its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more recent WG-2 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-2 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-2 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Pentax Optio WG-2 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Sony |
Model type | Pentax Optio WG-2 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2008-10-22 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 25MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6048 x 4032 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 192g (0.42 pounds) | 895g (1.97 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photographs | 880 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Launch cost | $350 | $2,736 |