Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung EX2F
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Announced July 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Lets look closer at the Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung EX2F, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Pentax and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the XG-1 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the XG-1 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") provide different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XG-1 was manufactured 20 months after the EX2F which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the XG-1 scores against the EX2F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax XG-1 & Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax XG-1 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Samsung EX2F
| XG-1 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2014 | December 2012 | More modern by 20 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Pentax XG-1
| EX2F | XG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung EX2F
| XG-1 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Pentax XG-1 has outside dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has specifications of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Compare the Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the XG-1 against the EX2F.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XG-1 and EX2F is 66 and 90 respectively.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by going through technical specs. The picture underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XG-1 and EX2F.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XG-1 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Pentax XG-1 will show more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The younger XG-1 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Pentax XG-1 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax XG-1 | Samsung EX2F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-07-15 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1248mm (52.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200k dots | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 567 grams (1.25 lb) | 294 grams (0.65 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LB-060 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $599 | $478 |