Clicky

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL350

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31
Ricoh CX1 front
 
Samsung TL350 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
47
Overall
38

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs

Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Launched February 2009
Samsung TL350
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
  • 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
  • Introduced February 2010
  • Additionally referred to as WB2000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL350 Overview

Its time to examine more in depth at the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the CX1 (9MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The CX1 was released 12 months earlier than the TL350 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the CX1 grades against the TL350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung TL350

 CX1 TL350 

Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh CX1

 TL350 CX1 
IntroducedFebruary 2010February 2009Newer by 12 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung TL350

 CX1 TL350 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Screen resolution920k920kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX1 comes with outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Samsung TL350 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung TL350 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the CX1 versus the TL350.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX1 and TL350 is 93 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The image here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the CX1 and TL350.

As you can tell, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Samsung TL350 to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged CX1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh CX1
Portrait photography with Samsung TL350
25
you can focus manually
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
MP count low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
35
you can focus manually
delivers RAW formats
can't use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh CX1
Street photography with Samsung TL350
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
65
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX1 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung TL350 as a Sports photography camera
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
29
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Travel photography factors
Samsung TL350 Travel photography factors
59
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
MP count low (9 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
60
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography advice
Samsung TL350 Landscape photography advice
42
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
MP count low (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
50
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX1 Vlogging advice
Samsung TL350 Vlogging advice
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic port
32
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX1 and Samsung TL350
 Ricoh CX1Samsung TL350
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX1 Samsung TL350
Also called - WB2000
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-02-19 2010-02-20
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3456 x 2592 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-200mm (7.1x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.3-5.2 f/2.4-5.8
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed - 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 5.20 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 180 gr (0.40 lbs) 195 gr (0.43 lbs)
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-70 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $299 $400