Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-70
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Updated by Ricoh WG-80
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Ricoh CX2 versus Ricoh WG-70, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX2 was unveiled 11 years earlier than the WG-70 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the CX2 matches up versus the WG-70 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX2 & Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Ricoh WG-70
| CX2 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Ricoh CX2
| WG-70 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 127 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh WG-70
| CX2 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 offers external dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX2 versus Ricoh WG-70 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the CX2 against the WG-70.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and WG-70 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The image here will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX2 and WG-70.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-70 to resolve more detail having an extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged CX2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-08-20 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 185g (0.41 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-70 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $341 | $280 |