Ricoh CX2 vs Zeiss ZX1
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
67 Imaging
78 Features
62 Overall
71
Ricoh CX2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Introduced September 2018
Ricoh CX2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Ricoh CX2 versus Zeiss ZX1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Zeiss. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and ZX1 (Full frame) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX2 was released 10 years before the ZX1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the CX2 matches up against the ZX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 and Zeiss ZX1. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Zeiss ZX1
CX2 | ZX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Ricoh CX2
ZX1 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | August 2009 | Fresher by 110 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 4.34" | 3" | Larger display (+1.34") | |
Display resolution | 2765k | 920k | Clearer display (+1845k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Zeiss ZX1
CX2 | ZX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX2 has outside measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Zeiss ZX1 has proportions of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX2 versus Zeiss ZX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the CX2 vs the ZX1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and ZX1 is 93 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The graphic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and ZX1.
To sum up, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The CX2 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Zeiss ZX1 will provide greater detail as a result of its extra 28 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older CX2 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Zeiss ZX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Zeiss |
Model | Ricoh CX2 | Zeiss ZX1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-08-20 | 2018-09-27 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 37 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 7488 x 4992 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 255 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2-22 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 4.34" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 2,765 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 185 grams (0.41 pounds) | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-70 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | 512GB internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $341 | - |