Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB210
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Ricoh CX3 versus Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and WB210 (14MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX3 was revealed 13 months earlier than the WB210 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the CX3 grades vs the WB210 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX3 & Samsung WB210. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX3 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung WB210
| CX3 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 1k | Clearer display (+919k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh CX3
| WB210 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 13 months |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB210
| CX3 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX3 enjoys outer measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh CX3 versus Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the CX3 against the WB210.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the CX3 and WB210 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The graphic here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and WB210.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB210 to offer you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The older CX3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Ricoh CX3 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 174g (0.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $329 | $279 |
