Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A7R IV
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
62 Imaging
81 Features
93 Overall
85
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A7R IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 61MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 102800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 665g - 129 x 96 x 78mm
- Announced July 2019
- Superseded the Sony A7R III
- Successor is Sony A7R V
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A7R IV Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony A7R IV, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and A7R IV (61MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and A7R IV (Full frame) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital III was unveiled 11 years prior to the A7R IV which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony A7R IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the GR Digital III matches up vs the A7R IV when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A7R IV Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony Alpha A7R IV. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Sony A7R IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony A7R IV
GR Digital III | A7R IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7R IV over the Ricoh GR Digital III
A7R IV | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2019 | July 2009 | Newer by 121 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1440k | 920k | Sharper display (+520k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony A7R IV
GR Digital III | A7R IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A7R IV Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sony A7R IV has dimensions of 129mm x 96mm x 78mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.1") along with a weight of 665 grams (1.47 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital III versus Sony A7R IV in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the GR Digital III versus the A7R IV.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and A7R IV is 92 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A7R IV Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The picture below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and A7R IV.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A7R IV will give you more detail having an extra 51 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A7R IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony A7R IV Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha A7R IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha A7R IV |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2019-07-16 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 61MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 9504 x 6336 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 32000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 567 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,440 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 5,760 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 lb) | 665g (1.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 129 x 96 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 99 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3344 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 670 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) |
Card slots | One | Two |
Retail cost | $399 | $3,498 |