Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
90 Imaging
58 Features
54 Overall
56
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- New Model is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Ricoh GR versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are sold by Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the GR (APS-C) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") feature different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR was launched 3 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the GR matches up vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
GR | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2013 | March 2010 | Fresher by 38 months | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 920k | Clearer display (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Ricoh GR
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | GR |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
GR | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR provides exterior dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the GR compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 90 and 85 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over specifications. The photograph underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Plainly, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Ricoh GR will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher GR should have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Ricoh GR | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh GR | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-04-17 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 300s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 4.50 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 355g (0.78 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | 410 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $971 | $349 |