Ricoh GR vs Samsung NX210
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Ricoh GR vs Samsung NX210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX200
- Later Model is Samsung NX300
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh GR vs Samsung NX210 Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Ricoh GR vs Samsung NX210, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR (16MP) and the NX210 (20MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (APS-C).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR was introduced 9 months later than the NX210 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung NX210 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the GR grades versus the NX210 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh GR vs Samsung NX210 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR & Samsung NX210. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR Gallery & Samsung NX210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung NX210
| GR | NX210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2013 |  | August 2012 | More recent by 9 months |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 614k | Clearer display (+616k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX210 over the Ricoh GR
| NX210 | GR |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung NX210
| GR | NX210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung NX210 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR enjoys outside measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX210 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR vs Samsung NX210 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the GR compared to the NX210.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR and NX210 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung NX210 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GR and NX210.
As you have seen, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Samsung NX210 to offer you extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The younger GR should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung NX210 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh GR vs Samsung NX210 Specifications
| Ricoh GR | Samsung NX210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh GR | Samsung NX210 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2013-04-17 | 2012-08-14 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 300s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/4000s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 222 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 78 | 71 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light score | 972 | 719 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 images | 330 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB65 | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $971 | $625 |