Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB800F (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was introduced 3 years prior to the WB800F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up against the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB800F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
WB800F | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | March 2010 | Fresher by 34 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB800F
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC offers physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the WB800F.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB800F is 85 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing specs. The visual below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB800F will result in greater detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung WB800F |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-03-18 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $349 | $300 |