Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Released January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and WB800F (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was introduced 3 years prior to the WB800F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up against the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung WB800F

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB800F 
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 WB800F GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
ReleasedJanuary 2013March 2010Fresher by 34 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB800F

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC WB800F 
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC offers physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

See the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and the WB800F.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB800F is 85 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing specs. The visual below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and WB800F.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB800F will result in greater detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography advice
36
has manual focus
exports RAW files
does not have liveview
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
44
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography info
Samsung WB800F Street photography info
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/1.7")
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Sports photography with Samsung WB800F
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not have liveview
low fps (2.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
no phase detect autofocus
53
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking focus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Travel photography camera
60
lighter than competition in class (355g)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
69
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography information
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography information
47
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
50
has manual focus
reasonably wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging factors
Samsung WB800F Vlogging factors
28
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (355g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have mic socket
35
reasonably wide (23mm)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
lack of mic jack
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung WB800F
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung WB800F
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung WB800F
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-03-18 2013-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-72mm (3.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.5-4.4 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 180s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.50 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355g (0.78 lbs) 218g (0.48 lbs)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $349 $300