Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony A300
93 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
64 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A330
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony A300 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony A300, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-20 (14MP) and A300 (10MP) and the WG-20 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-20 was brought out 6 years after the A300 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the WG-20 scores versus the A300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-20 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Sony A300
| WG-20 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | January 2008 | More modern by 74 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Ricoh WG-20
| A300 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Sony A300
| WG-20 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-20 has got external measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony A300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-20 vs the A300.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-20 and A300 is 93 and 64 respectively.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The pic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-20 and A300.
To sum up, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-20 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh WG-20 will result in greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-20 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-20 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-20 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2008-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 164g (0.36 lb) | 632g (1.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $370 | $0 |