Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f872/6f8720ca8a468a6a857a2e81d2ab270ad6d1a096" alt="Sigma SD10 front Sigma SD10 front"
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Expand to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released March 2004
- Superseded the Sigma SD9
- Later Model is Sigma SD14
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The WG-4 GPS was launched 10 years later than the SD10 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WG-4 GPS grades versus the SD10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sigma SD10. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sigma SD10
WG-4 GPS | SD10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | March 2004 | More recent by 121 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 130k | Sharper display (+330k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
SD10 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sigma SD10
WG-4 GPS | SD10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has physical measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sigma SD10 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the SD10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1250/c1250a7762ec9c0690e81452e9d79ff12df6a835" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and SD10 is 90 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36c29/36c2980e62c45a18d7d9e72582246c8c3399bebb" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and SD10.
All in all, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 GPS because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The younger WG-4 GPS provides an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70efa/70efa199d8dcb264661ee904c936eb916361aa03" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a80/82a809d8b5a2a7f1b8d7fd8c8aad78c792f93d94" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma SD10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sigma SD10 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2004-03-19 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 1.8" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 lb) | 950g (2.09 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $210 | $198 |