Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB210
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB210, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-50 was launched 5 years after the WB210 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WG-50 matches up against the WB210 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-50 & Samsung WB210. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Samsung WB210
| WG-50 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 72 months |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Crisper display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh WG-50
| WB210 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Samsung WB210
| WG-50 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-50 has got exterior measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB210 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-50 vs the WB210.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and WB210 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The picture below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-50 and WB210.
To sum up, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-50 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-50 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-50 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Samsung WB210 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2017-05-24 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | On, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 174g (0.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $280 | $279 |